Abstinence vs. Moderation: Which is Best?


Which is best? A complete and total avoidance of alcohol or a more moderate approach? Is it even possible for an addict to use alcohol moderately without stopping completely?
This is a difficult question and professionals have been debating the issue for more than 50 years. The answer depends on a number of factors and there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
It’s normal for people to resist the idea of stopping drinking completely when they begin to realize that jobs, health or relationships are jeopardized due to a drinking problem. They want to learn to drink less and to quit before they reach intoxication.
This attempt at moderation can be beneficial because for heavy drinkers, any reduction in drinking is good and an attempt at moderation is the first step to recovery. People who attempt moderation for the first time are admitting to themselves that a problem exists and they are displaying a willingness to make changes.
However, in some cases, people eventually come to the realization that total abstinence is a better solution, and is actually easier than attempting to maintain control.
According to Harvard University Medical School, moderate drinking is successful only for people who haven’t yet developed a serious dependence or who haven’t yet experienced serious consequences as a result of drinking. Learning moderate drinking can help people set goals and make better decisions before they cross the line to alcoholism.
One research study followed drinkers for three to eight years after they completed a program of behavioral self-control. The results indicated that the chance of successfully drinking moderately decreases dramatically according to the severity of dependence. People in the beginning stages of a drinking problem may achieve success.
If you are concerned as about your drinking, there are several things to think about.
Moderation may worth considering if:
Abstinence is likely the best option if:
What is best for you?
Continue the journey